A week ago, TalkPoverty described several severe issues with The Washington Post’s analysis that is recent of safety impairment advantages in rural America. Yesterday, The Post issued a modification alongside brand brand new calculations. Unfortuitously, you can still find major difficulties with their data—and their main thesis red tube.
For starters, The Post continues to over-count “working-age” beneficiaries by including over fifty percent a million individuals over 65—even incorporating in certain those who are a lot more than 80 years old. Continue reading “The Washington Post Went a Modification to Its Impairment Tale. Here’s Why It’s Nevertheless Incorrect.”